Jump to content

M.A.N. Agency

From GTA RP Wiki

The M.A.N. Agency (Monetary Assets Network Agency) was a covert financial–criminal organization operating within San Andreas for decades. Unlike traditional criminal syndicates that relied on visible violence or territorial control, the M.A.N. Agency functioned as a shadow institution, embedding itself into legitimate economic, political, and administrative systems. Its power stemmed not from notoriety, but from invisibility.

The Agency viewed money, influence, and people as interchangeable assets. Loyalty was transactional, authority was conditional, and removal was permanent.

Background/History

[edit | edit source]

Background & Founding (1990)

[edit | edit source]

The M.A.N. Agency was founded in 1990, during a period of rapid criminal consolidation and political transition in San Andreas. While conventional syndicates competed openly for territory, headlines, and reputation, the M.A.N. Agency emerged with a radically different philosophy: power should never be seen.

The organization was created by two shadowy figures known only as Black Man and White Man—aliases that became synonymous with the Agency itself. Both figures were known for wearing distinctive black and white combat masks, respectively, and for never appearing without them. Their true identities, origins, and even whether they were individuals or titles passed down over time remain unknown.

From its inception, the M.A.N. Agency rejected the public-facing notoriety embraced by gangs, cartels, and motorcycle clubs. Instead, it positioned itself as a meta-organization—one that did not compete within the criminal underworld, but controlled the conditions under which it operated.

The Redmond Initiative (1991)

[edit | edit source]

Following the Agency’s formal consolidation in 1991, Black Man and White Man shifted focus from structural embedding to long-term influence cultivation. Rather than expanding through brute acquisition, they began selectively investing in individuals—men whose careers, if guided correctly, could generate influence organically across generations. One of the earliest and most consequential of these investments was Samuel Redmond.

At the time, Redmond was a graduate instructor and junior lecturer, academically gifted but financially strained. He was married, supporting a growing family, and struggling to balance principle with survival. To the founders of the M.A.N. Agency, this combination made him neither weak nor corruptible—but malleable.

Redmond possessed a deep and uncommon expertise in labor unions, collective bargaining structures, and institutional labor politics. More importantly, he understood how ideology was formed in classrooms long before it manifested on streets or in boardrooms. Black Man and White Man recognized that universities were not merely educational institutions, but incubators of future power.

Through intermediaries, the Agency quietly stabilized Redmond’s financial situation. No contracts were signed. No allegiance was declared. What Redmond received was framed as opportunity—research grants, consulting offers, anonymous benefactors. In return, he was never asked for obedience, only access. Within a few years, Samuel Redmond rose to a full professorship at the University of San Andreas (ULSA).

Expansion & Coercive Influence (1992–1994)

[edit | edit source]

In the years following the Redmond Initiative, the M.A.N. Agency accelerated its expansion beyond San Andreas, quietly extending its reach abroad, including into the newly formed Russian Federation. While post-Soviet institutions were still unstable, the Agency identified opportunity in uncertainty.

Through financial intermediaries and offshore structures, the Network established contacts within Russian political and economic circles. Among these contacts was Grigory Venkov, a Kremlin-adjacent financier and fixer whose access to state-linked capital and emerging oligarchic structures made him a valuable foreign node. Venkov served as a conduit—facilitating capital movement, shielding transactions, and aligning Russian interests with M.A.N.-controlled markets in the West.

Simultaneously, the Agency consolidated its grip across San Andreas, embedding itself into logistics corridors, financial institutions, and criminal supply chains. Rather than competing with existing groups, the M.A.N. Agency imposed a quiet ultimatum: cooperation or erasure.

Smaller criminal organizations were approached indirectly and asked for tribute—not in the form of loyalty or branding, but access fees, laundering channels, or silence. Most complied, never fully understanding what they had become entangled with. Those who refused were not publicly attacked. Instead, they were dismantled through sudden arrests, financial collapse, internal betrayal, or unexplained disappearances. The lesson spread quickly, even if the source remained unnamed.

The Morrison Appointment (1995)

[edit | edit source]

In 1995, Black Man and White Man initiated one of the most important structural decisions in the Agency’s history: the recruitment of Alexander Morrison.

Morrison had drawn attention through his academic work at USLA and advanced understanding of financial systems, capital flow theory, and asset structuring. Unlike Samuel Redmond—who was cultivated as a long-term influence node—Alexander was identified as an operator.

When approached, Morrison made a decisive break from academia. He resigned from his university position and entered the M.A.N. Agency full-time, becoming one of the few individuals to knowingly work for the Network rather than merely adjacent to it.

Alexander was tasked with overseeing capital flows, asset control, shell structures, and internal financial architectureacross San Andreas and foreign extensions. His role was deliberately designed to overlap and counterbalanceRedmond’s sphere of influence. Where Redmond shaped ideology and future labor power, Morrison controlled liquidity and enforcement-by-finance.

This dual-node system was not accidental. Black Man and White Man engineered the overlap as a safeguard against internal consolidation of power. Neither man possessed full dominance; each served as a structural check on the other. If one node failed, destabilized, or defected, the Network could survive.